After the reign of Augustus, when the Denarius was about 1/8th of an ounce
|
OF COIN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sextula | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Quadrans | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Triens | 2 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Semissis | 3 | 2 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| AS | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Dupondius | 12 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 1 | - | - | - | - |
| SESTERTIUS | 24 | 16 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 | - | - | - |
| Quinarius | 48 | 32 | 24 | 16 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 | - | - |
| Denarius | 96 | 64 | 48 | 32 | 16 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 | - |
| AUREUS | 2400 | 1600 | 1200 | 800 | 400 | 200 | 100 | 50 | 25 | 1 |
A note on the comparative value of Roman coin
Although it is extraordinarily difficult to equate Roman with modern values, I personally find it difficult to read Tacitus, for example, without having some rough idea in my own mind of the values of the sums mentioned in the text. Our social structure and economy today cannot be compared with that of the classical world; we also came off the gold standard many years ago. The income differences between a Roman soldier and a small-scale Roman merchant can be compared to the difference now between the income of a child in a Brazilian favela and that of a western factory worker.
Nevertheless, for my own reference I have taken the rough curent bullion
value of the gold Aureus, at about 7.75 grams in weight, at around GBP50.
This allows me to think of a Sestertius as about 50p. This gives, in UK
sterling values, the following indicative comparative values;
|
|
|
|
| Wine, per modern bottle |
|
Comparable to current price without duty |
| Lawyer's fee |
|
Not much change here then! |
| Roman townhouse |
|
Comparable to London today |
| Land per acre |
|
Within current limits |
| Slave |
|
About the price of a second hand car |
| Oil per pint |
|
|
| Willed by Augustus to each ordinary soldier |
|
Elite soldiers got more |
| Soldier's pay per week after deductions |
|
He could buy a bottle or two of wine or.... |
| Prostitute |
|
|
| A man was "rich" if he owned property worth
more than |
|
OK, so subtract the balance owing on your
mortgage and what are you worth? |
| To be a Senator he had to own at least |
|
Not much change here then! |
Home | Calender | Capacity | Length | Surface | Weight | Links
Last modified 4.VI.01 by Mike Neill